Thursday, February 09, 2012

Intelligent Vs Brilliant

It is not how much intelligent you are that actually matters. It is how you channelize the intelligence that you have that matters and makes you brilliant - akp

There is one Professor who influenced me a lot (and so did he on several others too!). He is intelligent. But thinking deeply, I feel it is not just his intelligence that brought him the laurels - for I think there are several others whom I have come across who are at least as brilliant as he is but not so renowned. I believe it is his brilliance to channelize what he knew into actions that made a difference in one way or the other that singles him out from the rest!

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Ph.D Rules...

Over the last two and a half years of doing a Ph.D, I learnt a few things and I wrote the same as tag lines on my Orkut profile. These five Ph.D rules appeared over a period of five days on my Orkut profile - one per day. Considering the viewership it brought about and considering that some of them missed a few of the rules... I thought I can compile them and make it a blog post. Here is the compilation (thanks to my memory... I could remember all those five rules which I wrote!):

1. Do not do things in a way that satisfies others (includes your guide too); Do things in a way that satisfies yourself!

2. Decide not the time-frame within which you would like to finish your PhD; Decide on the learning you would like to have - doing your PhD.

3. Your PhD ends the day you get the confidence to work independently and solve the problems that arise in your field of interest.

4. Do not blame your guide. It does not help. Do things in such a way that you and your guide remain happy.

5. Pursue atleast one non-academic activity that you are passionate about. Know that there is life outside your lab too!

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Decisions

Decisions – that is what our daily life is filled with most of the time. It might be as simple as to decide whether to get up once the alarm goes off in the morning or it might be so important a decision like whether one has to join a job or opt for higher studies. Many a time, I have seen people (of course it includes me too!) committing two (too?) biggest mistakes while taking decisions. I have done it myself – at least one of them and atleast once in my life. And, I was about to do it again. There was a thing I had to decide over – something that had been pressing me for around a week or so. It did not let me concentrate on my research. I had almost done one of those two mistakes which people commonly make while taking decisions. But today suddenly, I realized what I was doing and stopped myself from doing the mistake. My mind became clear. And, I thought it was time again for me to sit down and pen my thoughts… And, here you go into my realm of thoughts…

Having told that there are two big mistakes that people generally make, let me state them first. The first mistake people make is that they let others take decisions for them. The second mistake they make is that they take the decisions first and then try to come up with satisfying logic to convince themselves that their decision is correct. Both the mistakes are equally destructive – especially when the decision is crucial for one’s future.

At times, people come to me asking suggestions as to what they have to do. Typically, they would describe a situation and would expect me to decide what they should do under that situation in which they find themselves at that point of time (Most of them are people who had known me as a person who writes a lot of blogs that sound convincingly logical that they think that my decisions would always be right!). I generally would tell my suggestion and then add up saying that it was their life and that it would be wise to take suggestions from anyone including me but that the decision they take must be their own self. One should understand that their issues are best understood only by themselves and that the decisions can be proper only if they decide – as they are the ones who would be knowing the bigger picture of it (When I say bigger picture I mean that there might be different factors that might have to be considered while taking the decision and others might not be aware of all those factors). I remember a long time back my parents when they wanted to shift from the rented house that we were in into the university quarters, they took the decision by writing chits and asking me to pick one of them [I was a small kid then and they thought that God (in my form!!!) let them take the right decision. I still remember being both worried and happy to do that at that time. Worried – because I wanted to shift to the quarters as it was something new for me and I certainly did not want myself being the reason for not shifting should I pick out the chit that said we should not shift. And, happy - because it was me and not my sister who was given the once in a lifetime opportunity to pick out the chit!]. It was several years later that I thought about that incident and wondered how people could let their decisions taken not by logic but by pure chance. I would say that it is one of the biggest mistakes one could do.

Considering the second mistake, I would as usual try to elaborate with an incident. When I came to know of pre-marital sex affairs happening at the institutes I studied (both at the institute where I did my M.Tech and where I currently do my Ph.D, I understand that this is not so common but does exist), I thought I should write about my views on it in my blogspot. But, when I started to think of my views on it, I understood something. My views were largely biased as it had already been driven into my mind that it was wrong to have sex before marriage. And, as everyone would agree – in India – even talking about or using the word ‘sex’ is considered to be a taboo. Having been brought up under such an environment, I could not help fixing my view (that it is wrong to have pre-marital sexual affairs) first and then coming up with some logic to prove my view to be correct. So, I never wrote that post and probably would never write about it in future too (I feel that some things that are driven into one’s mind in childhood can never be changed). Most of the readers of my blog believe that my views on various issues are highly logical and true. It is because when I write about my views, I start with a clear mindset. I do not fix my conclusions first. I rather try to think about the issue through logical reasoning. The conclusion is the result of the logical discussion I have within myself on the issue. This holds good even when one takes decisions in their life. Decisions would be correct only when they are arrived at through logical reasoning. Trying to attach some reasoning to a blindly taken decision makes no sense.

Whenever humans are in the process of decision making, there usually are two things within them that actively participate. To differentiate the two, let me call them “the mind” and “the heart”. “Mind” knows only logic. Further it can take inputs from the “heart” and can reason out if what the “heart” says is sensible. The “mind” does not have emotions. On the other hand, “heart” knows no common sense logic. It is largely driven by emotions. Love, affection, hatred, jealousy and the like – these are what it knows.

To make myself clear, I have to give you a few examples. One fine Sunday morning, I had throat infection at its beginning stages. I took some ayurvedic medicine which usually cures it better than the antibiotic that the doctor prescribes (If you would like to try it out, just mail me. It really works well!). When it was lunch time I remembered that they give ice-cream in my mess on Sunday afternoons. Now, I had to take a decision on whether to eat the ice-cream or not. And, I obviously liked ice-creams very much. I thought for a moment. My “mind” advised me not to eat. My “heart” knew I loved it. It asked me not to worry but to eat as I was already taking the medicine. I let my “heart” take the decision. And, in the next two days, the throat infection worsened and in addition I got fever too (Of course, I could not eat ice-cream for the next two weeks). To give you another example, once I was down with some illness. And, it did not seem to be getting cured that easily. My mother was too worried. And, at that time some one told that a piece of cloth given to her probably months earlier had to be tied at the temple of a particular God and should not be kept at home. They suggested that it probably was the cause for my continued illness. Now, my mother let her “heart” take the decision. She wanted the cloth to be immediately tied at the temple. Unfortunately, the cloth was not found. My mother was getting worried and my father was getting angrier. Finally the cloth was somehow found and it was tied at the temple. In a few days, I began to recover from the illness and my mother believed that it had something to do with the cloth also. So, decisions based on “heart” might not just be wrong. But they might also be foolish. By now, you should certainly have understood what I mean by “mind” and “heart”.

Immediately, if you jump to the conclusion that one should always let the “mind” take the decision, it is not really correct. To understand that, let us consider that a neighbour gives three pieces of a sweet to a mother whose kid likes the sweet so much. If the mother lets her “mind” make a decision, she would give one each to her husband and kid and would have the third one for herself. As I told earlier, the “mind” knows only logic and nothing else. But, if she were to let her “heart” decide, she would be giving one sweet to her husband and would give the rest two to her kid. Obviously, now we have a problem as to when to let the “mind” take the decision and when to let the “heart” take the decision. The solution is simple. Though the “mind” can think of just logic, it can analyze what the “heart” says and can come to a conclusion on whether what the heart says is sensible. It would be acceptable to the “mind” to give two pieces of the sweet to the kid. To put it in three simple statements, I would say: “Those decisions taken by “heart” will many a time be wrong . Those decisions taken by the “mind” would always be right but not the best for the situation. Those decisions taken by the “mind” with inputs from the “heart” is what would always be the best.”

Decisions make up life. Decide yourself how you would take decisions the next time you find yourselves at crossroads in your life.

Labels: , ,

Friday, November 16, 2007

Why did it happen?


“Some things happen just because they have to happen” - akp

Some things that happen in life make us ask, “Why did it happen that way?” At times we like to go back in time to stop/change the event that had eventually led to something “happening that way”. We would like all those things that had led to “that” to become a dream so that we can wake up and find life to be smooth. Everyone experiences this at some point in life and life becomes miserable when one thinks more about it and wants to answer the question, “Why did it happen?” Of course there is an answer to every question (about life) and this too has an answer. But why life becomes miserable is that the situation is so complex that people expect the answer to be complex too. But, actually the answer is simple. And, more than just being simple, the answer is invariably the same for all those situations that make people raise the question, “Why did it happen that way?” The answer is what I have quoted above. “Some things happen just because they have to happen”.

I know: You would not accept this. This would seem ridiculous. You might argue that this is not an answer in the first place since it does not explain anything. I told you, “the answer is simple”. And, the simplicity is what puzzles people. And, those who understand and accepts this answer will lead a happy life.

Labels: ,

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Expectations ruin life...


'Uncertainity' is the basis of life. So, don't have expectations. Have goals and work towards them. But never expect that you will always end up with success. - akp.

Labels: ,

Saturday, October 01, 2005

God - I

It is when I was in 10th standard that I questioned myself what "God" means! This blog is just an outcome of my conversation with my inner-conscience, around 10 yrs back. I remember very well - I was going in my cycle when this question of "God" struck my mind. It was actually a series of questions... Does God really exist? If so, is God a "person" with extraordinary powers? And, where is God? Everywhere? Then, why does not God show Himself up to any of us? If God is so good, why does He let evil creep into the earth? Is God controlling the Universe? Is Universe a plaything for Him – some sort of sport? ...the list goes endless! And, when I found (after a lot of thinking over this issue) a satisfactory definition for "God" – something that could convince my conscience, I changed many things in my day-to-day life.".

When I began to think about what God really meant, my primary concern was to answer the question, "Does God really exist?" If the answer is "No" then I could stop at that point. But if the answer is "Yes", I have to justify it by giving a proper "definition" to the word "God". By "definition" I refer to explaining the basic questions 'Who, Where and How' is God? Now, this definition should also solve the endless list of questions that I had in my mind – atleast to a greater extent possible! As a student of science, I could not accept that God controls universe... or to put it in other words, I did not believe that God is someone who could drench you in rain when He wished. I believed that the mysteries of nature could be explained by science... after all with the development of science, it was already possible to forecast climate, study about stars and planets, make satellites circle the earth,... . If there was something that science could not explain, it just meant that science had not advanced that much to give an explanation. It cannot be termed as God’s act. But, even after having these thoughts, I still could not say that there did not exist any "God". The reason is that, there were many things that pointed to the "existence of God". For example, people could get their problems solved when they prayed to "God". Though I did not support the theory that God solved the problem, I could not despise the fact that prayer had some effect in getting solution to problems. So, I chose to "logically" believe that there existed "God". Having accepted the existence of God, I now had the uphill task of defining "God

When I started out to "define" God, I could rule out the possibility of God having a "physical" presence because if God had had "physical" form and was too good at heart, He would have done two things. Firstly, He would have shown up before some people atleast (who are good and believed in Him). Secondly, there is no reason why He should allow humans to do wrong things! Now, I began to think of what "God" could be! To arrive at some conclusion, I chose to think logically again. There was one clue towards getting the solution – "prayer helped in reaching God". Thinking on these lines, it also struck me that if someone concentrates on a particular thing, he/she is bound to get some solution for what he/she is thinking about. This I myself had experienced. Also, there were many incidents supporting this. So, I began to analyze if – God might be related to "thoughts". Finally – after a lot of for and against arguments (with my inner-conscience) on this assumption – I came out with final acceptable (to me!) definition of God that can be put forth as follows:

"God is a conglomeration of all the good thoughts let out by humans. There is also a collection of all bad thoughts – that we call it the "Satan". Both God and Satan will repay us in proportion to what we contribute to them. But it is to be kept in mind that God can repay us by good only and Satan by evil deeds only."

I could convince myself with the above definition as it answered majority of questions related to God (though there are still some unanswered questions!) in a satisfying manner. Now, I could say God existed everywhere as God is just "thoughts". No one has ever seen God, as "thoughts" have no physical presence. When people pray, they think of good things only and so they are being paid back with good deeds. And, when people pray, their problems get solved – not because there is someone watching them pray and provide solutions to them. It is just that, when they pray, they concentrate more towards their solution and also contribute some "good" thought. As a result, they get a clear mindset to think of a solution to their own problems. This might also be thought of as a "pay back" for their contribution to the "good thoughts". Actually, even after defining God as a "conglomeration of good thoughts", I wanted some strong support for my definition as it was just a child’s conclusion (considering my age at that time – 15 yrs) on a topic which can be analyzed in greater depth only by elder people who have more experience in life (However, I still believed in my conclusion!). The support I was looking for did come accidentally – when I joined my B.E in 1999.I came across the works of Swami Vivekananda and in that I could see to my astonishment every point which I had discussed to myself – but in a more refined way. He had written in one of his works, "all our minds are a part of the universal mind" which is what I call it the "conglomeration of thoughts". He had discussed the powers of the mind (thoughts) and about concentration. On reading his works, I began to have "high respect" for him. Though he followed Hinduism, he stressed on the oneness of all religions.

As I already mentioned in the starting paragraph, I had to change many things after "defining" God. Having understood that "concentration" is the basis of prayer, I no longer liked going to temples on special occasions when there is a rush and "concentrating" becomes difficult. Also, I could not accept large amounts of money being spent on performing costly rituals in the name of "poojas" while there are millions of people starving. I began to believe strongly that "God" exists only if "people" exists, for "God" is just good thoughts. My stress is on improving the living condition of humans. My point is that it is enough if we maintained the existing places of worship and to divert the remaining money for the development of mankind. However people around me began to consider me as having "indifferent" attitude towards the "holy rituals" and they doubted if I am an atheist. Some have even asked me so! For those who know me, I tell you, "I am not an atheist. It is just that I have a different perception of God. I am a person who believes in science more than superstition; and believes in common sense more than science itself!" Actually there is still a lot I would like to write on this topic… without which my views on God is incomplete. However, I do not want to burden the readers with too much of my views. So, await God – II (might come up after a month or so!) where I will write how people are seeking God without knowing what "God" meant. Also, I will write why certain things needs to get changed for the betterment of the society! And, if you think – after reading this – that I am trying to bring up a new religion or that I am trying to make people follow Swami Vivekananda, I will prove your assertion to be wrong in God - II. Will meet you in God II!

Labels: ,

Sunday, July 03, 2005

Success

Before you start reading, list down five to ten people whom you think are successful... Have you done it - atleast in your mind, if not in a paper? Now, see if they fall under any of these categories… scientists who changed the world, rich businessmen, well-known politicians/freedom fighters, sports persons, spiritual saints, peace-makers, cinema artists or famous writers. Are there people in your list whom you have been around with atleast during a part of your lifetime? If no, then I would say that you do not have a correct definition for success. Many of us think that money and fame is what success is all about and so our list of successful persons contains people who fall under one of the above mentioned categories. But success is not simply making money or becoming famous… and here are my views on success - in the following paragraphs.

I have many a time heard people talking about success and most of the time they come up with examples of people who are either rich or famous. And, one day I began to wonder is it all fame and money that decides success. Should I have to invent something new or built a million dollar industry to become successful? – was the question. After thinking about this deeply, I came to a conclusion that many of us don’t have a proper definition for success.

Many a time when we think of success, we take examples of the rich and the famous – say, Bill Gates or Dhirubhai Ambani or Dr.Abdul Kalam. Now, have we ever met them? Most of us haven’t. But, we speak about them from what we have heard about them. I do not say that they are not successful. Also, I do not say that we should not get inspirations from them. But, I do believe that we should also look at people around us – people who are not rich and famous – but can be taken as examples to be followed; people whom we have been meeting daily, speaking with and are known to us. We have an illusion that success is synonymous to money and fame. So, we miss out the ordinary – yet successful – people whom we meet daily. Probably, some of us have thought in these lines… but even those who have done so are not ready to discuss it – fearing that the society might not agree with what they think.

If I were to explain what success is – in a single sentence – I would say,

“Given the set of constraints one has by birth (money, education, circumstances under which one is brought up) and given one’s interests/goals, if he/she is able to make the most of what is given to him/her - trying to reach his/her goal - then, he/she is successful in life.”

Here are some successful people I have come across in my life… these examples of people I give here should drive home my point…

After six years of passing out of school, still I make it a point to meet my teachers atleast once in a year. They had an interest in teaching. They considered teaching not as a job but more of a service. They are not rich. They are not known world-wide. Yet, given their circumstances and interest, they are successful. They didn’t build industries but they did make good humans.

And, then there was a person in my college mess - who worked as a server. When every other worker used to brood over the lower wages and worked with insincerity, he used to do his work with dedication. He used to serve the food just the way we serve food for relatives who pay a visit to our home. The instant he spots someone’s plate getting empty, he would be there asking if that student would like to have some more rice. There was something that people around him could learn from him – sincerity and dedication at work. Given his circumstances, I would say – he is successful in life.

Here is one final example to reiterate my point - my paternal grandfather. Though he has had very less of formal education, he educated his children and there is a lot one can learn from him – which no formal education can impart in you and me. How can I not say that he is successful?

Often people compare themselves with the famous personalities and the rich people and start to believe that they are not successful. Life is like a game of chess. Just like every coin on the board is unique by its position and allowed movements, everyone of us are unique with respect to our talents. But the problem is that everyone of us wants to be the king or the queen (the rich and famous). By wanting to be the king/queen, we forget our talents as a pawn or a bishop or a horse or a rook. Remember – just like the fact that a pawn, bishop, horse and the rook are indispensable for a game of chess, we need people of different talents in the game of life. Imagine a chessboard full of king/queen alone. It is what would happen if all humans were to be rich and famous. Don’t hesitate to be a pawn – if that is what your circumstances and interests dictate you to be. Think how you can make the best use of your talents. Be yourself and don’t ever compare yourself with anyone. You can learn from other’s lives but never should you want to be just like others. The day you start wanting to be others, you lose your identity and you are not towards success!

Now, you might have a question lingering in your mind. By what I have said till now, do I mean to say that everyone is successful as they are? Can we attribute everything to the circumstances/fate? No, certainly not. I just mean that we should have a clear definition for success and we should understand that success is not money/fame. Everyone of us should ask ourselves, “Am I successful?”. We should be true to ourselves when we answer to this question. If our conscience says that we are doing our best to reach our goals – given the circumstances under which we live, then, we are successful. If we think there is something more we can do – we have to try improving ourselves.

WISHING YOU SUCCESS!

Labels: